Biodegradation Process and Composition

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are novel microbial compositions and biodegradation processes to treat marine animal or marine animal by-products to produce solid, liquid and lipid fractions that contain useful compounds.

This application is a U.S. National Stage application under 37 C.F.R.§3.71, claiming priority to PCT application serial no. PCT/EP2010/070285filed Dec. 20, 2010, claiming the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. Nos. 61/289,706, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 61/299,869, filedJan. 29, 2010, and 61/355,365, filed Jun. 16, 2010 under 35 U.S.C.§119(e) and are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Disclosed are novel microbial compositions and microbial processes totreat marine animal by-products and in some cases the entire marineanimal to produce solid, liquid and lipid fractions that contain usefulcompounds.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The processing of fish and marine arthropods, such as shrimp, crab andcrayfish, produces large quantities of marine by-products. Most are usedin low end products such as fertilizers, fish silage or pet food but theunused by-products pose an economic burden for the marine productprocessing industries because of the need to dispose of such residues inan environmentally sound way. By some estimates such by-productsrepresent 25% of the total production captured by fisheries.

For example, during the processing of shrimp for its subsequent freezingand marketing, a large amount of remains are generated since 35% of theanimal is inedible and must be discarded. These remnants or by-productsare composed of the shrimp's cephalothorax and exoskeleton. However,these shrimp by-products are rich in high-value substances, such aschitin, protein, lipids, carotenoid pigments (astaxanthine) andminerals. The majority of the inedible by-products are disposed atlandfills or dumped back into the ocean, thus causing seriousenvironmental problems and considerable losses to the shrimp processingindustry. At present, only a small amount of these by-products are usedas a supplement for animal feed.

The most common technique for shrimp by-product utilization is sundrying. This technique has low hygienic control and the products areused primarily for animal consumption. Other methods employ chemicalacids and alkalis at different concentrations, temperatures and timesfor the extraction of chitin and recovery of protein hydrolysates.However, these methods cause a depolymerization and partialdeacetylation of the chitin. Moreover, these methods complicate therecovery of other products, such as protein and pigment.

Enzymatic methods have been developed for the extraction of chitin,liquid hydrolysates and pigments. Such methods use enzymatic extracts orenzyme isolates. Other studies have reported the use of microbialenzymes, such as commercial alcalase, for the extraction of proteinsfrom shrimp and marine animal by-products. The combination of alcalaseand pancreatin has been reported for the extraction of chitin,hydrolyzed protein and pigmented lipids.

Lactic fermentation processes have been used as a substitute for theabove chemical and enzymatic processes. Fermentation represents a costeffective technique which stabilizes and retains the nutritional qualityof the by-products. The optimal conditions for fermentation depend onseveral factors including the choice and concentration of carbohydrates,pH, temperature, time, and the choice of aerobic or anaerobicconditions. Another important factor is the choice of microorganism andinitial inoculum concentration. To facilitate the fermentation processof shrimp by-products pure cultures of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) havebeen used. Such LAB include Lactobacillus plantarum (Rao, M. S.,Stevens, W. F., 2006, “Fermentation of shrimp biowaste under differentsalt concentrations with amylolytic and non-amylolitic Lactobacillusstrains for chitin production,” Food Technology and Biotechnology 44,83-87; Rao, M. S., Munoz, J., Stevens, W. F., 2000, “Critical factors inchitin production by fermentation of shrimp biowaste,” AppliedMicrobiology and Biotechnology 54, 808-813; Bhaskar, N., Suresh, P. V.,Sakhare, P. Z., Sachindra, N. M., 2007, “Shrimp biowaste fermentationwith Pediococcus acidolactici CFR2182: optimization of fermentationconditions by response surface methodology and effect of optimizedconditions on deproteination/demineralization and carotenoid recovery,”Enzyme and Microbial Technology 40, 1427-1434), Lactobacillus sp. 82(Circ, L. A., Huerta, S., Hal, G. M., Shirai, K., 2002, “Pilot scalelactic acid fermentation of shrimp waste for chitin recovery,” ProcessBiochemistry 37, 1359-1366; Shirai, K., Guerrero, I., Huerta, S.,Saucedo, G., Castillo, A., Gonzalez, R. O., Hall, G. M., 2001, “Effectof initial glucose concentration and inoculation level of lactic acidbacteria in shrimp waste ensilation,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology28, 446-452), Lactobacillus casei (Shirai 2001), Lactobacillus paracasei(Jung, W. J., Jo, G. H., Kuk, J. H., Kim, Y. J., Oh, K. T., Park, R. D.,2007, “Production of chitin from red crab shell waste by successivefermentation with Lactobacillus paracasei KCTC-3074 and Serratiamarcescens FS-3,” Carbohydrate Polymers 68, 746-750), Lactobacilluspentosus (Bautista, J., Jover, M., Gutierrez, J. F., Corpas, R.,Cremades, O., Fontiveros, E., Iglesias, F., Vega, J., 2001, “Preparationof crayfish chitin by in situ lactic acid production,” ProcessBiochemistry 37, 229-234; Shirai 2001), Lactobacillus acidophilus 84495and Lactobacillus lactis (Bhaskar 2007), Lactobacillus salvarus (Beaney2005), Enteroccus facium (Beaney 2005), Pedioccoccus acidilactici(Bhaskar 2007) and Pedioccoccus sp. L1/2 (Choorit, W., Patthanamanee,W., Manurakchinakorn, S., 2008, “Use of response surface method for thedetermination of demineralization efficiency in fermented shrimpshells,” Biores. Technol. 99, 6168-6173). In addition, a mixture of fourLAB has been used (Bhaskar 2007) and there are reports usingLactobacillus in combination with Serratia marcescens FS-3 (Jung 2007)or Staphylococcus carnosus (Shirai 2001). However, the industrializationof such fermentation processes has not been successful due the poorperformance of commercial inoculants.

Lactic fermentation of shrimp by-products produces protein hydrolysates,chitin, minerals, and lipids. Chitin and its deacetylated derivativeshave many applications in agriculture, biomedicine, food and the paperindustry, while liquid hydrolysate is an excellent source of essentialamino acids that can be used for human or animal consumption. Thelipidic paste contains sterols, vitamin A and E, and carotenoid pigmentssuch as astaxanthin which can be used in feed for salmonoids or as anatural coloring in the food industry.

Chitin is a natural polysaccharide found particularly in the exoskeletonof crustaceans, the cuticles of insects, and the cell walls of fungi.Because chitin is one of the most abundant biopolymers, much interesthas been paid to its biomedical, biotechnological and industrialapplications. Chitosans are poly-(β-1-4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminecompounds produced by the deacetylation of chitin(β-1-4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Glucosamine is an amino monosaccharideobtained by de-polymerization of chitosan. It participates in theconstitution of glycosaminoglycans, a major class of extracellularcomplex polysaccharides. Glucosamine sulphate, glucosamine hydrochlorideand N-acetyl-glucosamine are commonly used alone or as part of amixture.

Generally, the liquid hydrolysate has a high content of essential aminoacids, indicating a high nutritional value that justifies its use as asupplement for animal and aquaculture nutrition or as a nitrogen sourcein growth media for microorganisms. Additionally, these hydrolysates area source of free amino acids and can be used for nutrition in plants asa biostimulant.

Astaxanthine (3,3″-dihydroxy-8,8-carotene-4,4′-dione), a ketocarotenoidoxidized from β-carotene, naturally occurs in a wide variety of marineand aquatic organisms. Due to its attractive pink color, its biologicalfunctions as a vitamin A precursor, and antioxidative activity,astaxanthine can be used as a colorant in food and in medicine. In thestructure of astaxanthine, two identical asymmetric carbon atoms at C3and C3′ are found. However trans-asthaxanthine is the quantitativelymost prevalent carotenoid in crustacean species.

References disclosing these and other products from lactic fermentationinclude: Sanchez-Machado et al. “Quantification of organic acids infermented shrimp waste by HPLC” Food Technology and Biotechnology,volume 46, 456 (2008); Sanchez-Machado et al. “High-performance liquidchromatography with fluorescence detection for quantitation oftryptophan and tyrosine in a shrimp waste protein concentrate”, Journalof Chromatography B, volume 863, 88 (2008); Lopez-Cervantes et al.,“Quantitation of glucosamine from shrimp waste using HPLC” Journal ofChromatographic Science, volume 45, 1 (2007); Lopez-Cervantes et al.,“Quantification of astaxanthin in shrimp waste hydrolysate by HPLC”Biomedical Chromatography, volume 20, 981 (2006); Lopez-Cervantes etal., “High-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneousquantification of retinol, alpha-tocopherol, and cholesterol in shrimpwaste hydrolysate” Journal of Chromatography A, volume 1105, 1-2 (2006);Lopez-Cervantes et al., “Analysis of free amino acids in fermentedshrimp waste by high-performance liquid chromatography”, Journal ofChromatography A, volume 1105, 1 (2006).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed are microbial compositions and biodegradation processes.

One microbial composition comprises (a) one or more lactic acid bacteria(LAB) and (b) one or more or two or more microorganisms selected fromthe group of genera consisting of Bacillus, Azotobacter, Trichoderma,Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces., Micrococcus,Nitrobacter and Proteus. In preferred embodiments at least one of theBacillus, Azotobacter, Trichoderma, Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas,Streptomyces., Micrococcus, Nitrobacter and Proteus is a chitinolyticstrain that produces a chitinase (e.g. endochitinase and/orexochitinase). In some microbial compositions the LAB is selected fromthe genera consisting of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Lactococcus, andStreptococcus. When the LAB is Lactobacillus, it is preferred that theLAB is Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or Lactobacillus casei, morepreferably Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) and Lactobacilluscasei (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Bacillus in this composition is preferably selected from the groupconsisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium,Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus thuringiensis, more preferablyBacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008) and Bacillus thuringiensisstrains HD-1 and HD-73 (SILoSil®BT).

The Azotobacter in this composition is preferably Azotobactervinelandii, more preferably Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Trichoderma in this composition is preferably Trichoderma harzianum,more preferably Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL)

The Rhizobium in this composition is preferably Rhizobium japonicum,more preferably Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Clostridium in this composition is preferably Clostridiumpasteurianu, more preferably Clostridium pasteurianu (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Pseudomonas in this composition is preferably Pseudomonasfluorescens, more preferably Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008).

Another microbial composition comprises one or more or two or moremicroorganisms selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis((SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium(Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008),Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei(Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL), Rhizobiumjaponicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008), Pseudomonas fluorescens(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensis strains HD-1 and HD-73(SILoSil®BT), Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008), Micrococcus (Bioderpac,2008), Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus (Bioderpac, 2008).

Another embodiment of a microbial composition of comprises Lactobacillusacidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) and/or Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac,2008).

A particularly preferred microbial composition comprises Bacillussubtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillusmegaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008),Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei(Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL), Rhizobiumjaponicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008), Pseudomonas fluorescens(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensis strains HD-1 and HD-73,Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008), Micrococcus (Bioderpac, 2008),Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus (Bioderpac, 2008).

A preferred microbial composition is HQE. HQE was deposited with theAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC) Manassas, Va., USA on Apr. 27,2010 and given Patent Deposit Designation PTA-10861.

Also disclosed are isolated microorganisms selected from the groupconsisting of Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil®BS), Bacillus cereus(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobactervinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac,2008), Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum(TRICHOSIL), Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridiumpasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac,2008), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensisstrains HD-1 and HD-73 (SILoSil®BT), Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008),Micrococcus (Bioderpac, 2008), Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus(Bioderpac, 2008).

The biodegradation process comprises mixing a marine animal or marineanimal by-product with any of the aforementioned microbial compositionsto form a mixture; fermenting the mixture; and separating the mixtureinto solid, aqueous and lipid fractions. Unlike prior art biodegradationprocesses, the disclosed biodegradation process produces chitosan andglucosamine which can be found in the aqueous fraction. The marineanimal is preferably a marine arthropod, such as shrimp, crayfish, crabor krill. In some embodiments the marine animal is fish or a fish byproduct such as fish skin, muscle or organ.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 schematically shows a preferred degradation process for shrimpby-products.

FIG. 2 depicts the pH and total titratable acidity during lacticfermentation of the shrimp by-products.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As used herein, the term “marine animal” refers to any animal that livesin oceans, seas or fresh water. Marine animals include fish and marinearthropods.

As used herein the term “marine arthropod” refers to an invertebratemarine animal having an exoskeleton that lives in oceans, seas or freshwater. Generally marine arthropods have a segmented body, and jointedappendages. Marine arthropods are members of the subphylum Crustacea.Preferred classes of Crustacea include Branchiopoda (e.g. brine shrimp,Cladocera and Triops), Cephalocardia (e.g. horseshoe shrimp),Maxillopoda (e.g. barnacles and copepods (zooplankton)), Ostracoda (e.g.ostracods) and Malacostraca (e.g. crab, lobsters, shrimp, krill etc.).

As used herein, the term “by-product” refers to any part of a marineanimal. In some embodiments, the by-product is produced by thecommercial processing of the marine animal. For example, in the shrimpindustry, the cephalothorax and exoskeleton are shrimp by-products. Inthe crab and lobster processing industry the exoskeleton (shell) is aby-product.

In some embodiments, the entire arthropod can be used in thebiodegradation process. For example, many krill are about 1-2centimeters (0.4-0.8 in) long as adults but a few species grow to sizeson the order of 6-15 centimeters (2.4-5.9 in). Krill oil contains atleast three components: (1) omega-3 fatty acids similar to those in fishoil, (2) omega-3 fatty acids conjugated to phospholipids and (3) theantioxidant astaxanthin. In addition, the exoskeleton contains fluoride.Accordingly, these components can be separated in the biodegradationprocess with the oil components being isolated in the lipid fraction andthe fluoride in the liquid fraction.

As used herein the term “microbial composition” refers to a liquid,solid or gelatinous medium containing or physically supporting one ormore microorganisms, preferably two or more. Microbial compositionsinclude, but are not limited to, fermentation broths containing one ormore microorganism(s) and inoculums which are generally used to start afermentation broth and which contain a higher concentration of themicroorganisms than which are present in the fermentation broth.Microbial compositions containing species/strains are sometimes referredto as “Bioderpac microbial compositions” which refers to a compositioncontaining one or more of the microorganisms or a combination of one ormore microorganisms with other microorganisms.

As used herein the term “isolated microorganism” refers to a liquid,solid or gelatinous medium containing or physically supporting onemicroorganism.

The disclosed microbial compositions or isolated microorganisms can becombined with other microorganisms to form a new microbial compositionwhich can be used for processes other than those specifically disclosedherein. The selection of disclosed microorganism(s) will depend on itsbiological properties (e.g. production of protein or carbohydrate orchitin degrading enzymes), the other microorganisms selected and theprocess in which the combination is to be used. The selection of suchcomponents and processes will be apparent to the skilled artisanfollowing the disclosure herein.

One microbial composition comprises (a) one or more lactic acid bacteria(LAB) and (b) one or more or two or more microorganisms selected fromthe group of genera consisting of Bacillus, Azotobacter, Trichoderma,Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces., Micrococcus,Nitrobacter and Proteus. In preferred embodiments at least one or more,two or more or three or more of the Bacillus, Azotobacter, Trichoderma,Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces., Micrococcus,Nitrobacter and Proteus is a chitinolytic strain that produces achitinase (e.g. endochitinase and/or exochitinase). In some microbialcompositions the LAB is selected from the genera consisting ofLactobacillus, Pediococcus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus. When the LABis Lactobacillus, it is preferred that the LAB is Lactobacillusacidophilus and/or Lactobacillus casei, more preferably Lactobacillusacidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) and Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Bacillus in this composition is preferably selected from the groupconsisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium,Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus thuringiensis, more preferablyBacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008) and Bacillus thuringiensisstrains HD-1 and HD-73 (SILoSil®BT).

The Azotobacter in this composition is preferably Azotobactervinelandii, more preferably Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Trichoderma in this composition is preferably Trichoderma harzianum,more preferably Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL).

The Rhizobium in this composition is preferably Rhizobium japonicum,more preferably Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Clostridium in this composition is preferably Clostridiumpasteurianu, more preferably Clostridium pasteurianu (Bioderpac, 2008).

The Pseudomonas in this composition is preferably Pseudomonasfluorescens, more preferably Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008).

Another microbial composition comprises one or more or two or moremicroorganisms selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis((SILoSiI® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium(Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008),Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei(Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL), Rhizobiumjaponicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008), Pseudomonas fluorescens(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensis strains HD-1 and HD-73(SILoSil®BT), Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008), Micrococcus (Bioderpac,2008), Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus (Bioderpac, 2008).

Another embodiment of a microbial composition of comprises Lactobacillusacidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) and/or Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac,2008).

A particularly preferred microbial composition comprises Bacillussubtilis ((SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillusmegaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008),Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei(Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL), Rhizobiumjaponicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008),Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008), Pseudomonas fluorescens(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensis strains HD-1 and HD-73(SILoSil®BT), Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008), Micrococcus (Bioderpac,2008), Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus (Bioderpac, 2008).

The preferred microbial composition for use in the biodegradationprocess is HQE. HQE was deposited with the American Type CultureCollection (ATCC) Manassas, Va., USA on Apr. 27, 2010 and given PatentDeposit Designation PTA-10861. HQE is a microbial consortium made up ofmicroorganisms derived from fertile soils and microorganisms fromcommercial sources. The microorganisms form commercial sources includeBacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillus thuringiensis strains ND-1 andHD-73 (SILoSil®BT) and Trichoderma harzianum each obtained fromBiotecnologia Agroindustrial S.A. DE C.V., Morelia, Michoacan, MexicoMicroorganisms designated “Bioderpac 2008” by strain or species andstrain can be derived from HQE. However, subsets of the microorganismsin HQE can also be used. The Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillusthuringiensis (SILoSil® BT) and Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL)microorganisms produce chitinolytic enzymes that are especiallyimportant at the beginning of the biodegradation. The chitinolyticenzymes help to degrade chitin containing solids which can constitute abarrier to further digestion. These organisms also produce proteases,lipases and other enzymes that facilitate the breakdown of proteins,lipids and carbohydrates.

As used herein, the term “HYTb refers to the aqueous fraction obtainedfrom the biodegradation process. HYTb contains typically contains aminoacids (about 3 wt % to 12 wt %, usually about 12 wt %), chitosan (about1.2 wt %), glucosamine (about 1 wt %) and trace elements (about 6 wt %)including calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, iron and manganese. Theamount of chitosan can range between about 0.5 wt % and 1.5 wt %, morepreferably between about 1.0 wt % and 1.5 wt %. The amount ofglucosamine can range between about 0.5 wt % and 1.5 wt %, morepreferably between about 1.0 wt % and 1.5 wt %. The total of chitosanand glucosamine is about 2.0 to 2.5 wt %. HYTb also contains enzymessuch as lactic enzymes, proteases, lipases, chitinases, lactic acid,polypeptides and other carbohydrates. The specific gravity of HYTb istypically about 1.050-1.054. The average amino acid content in HYTb forcertain amino acids is set forth in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Amino acid profile dry powder hydrolysates (mg per g dry weight)Dry powder Amino acid hydrolysates Aspartic acid 38 Glutamic acid 39Serine 16 Histidine* 9 Glycine 28 Threonine* 14 Alanine 36.1 Proline25.8 Tyrosine* 70 Arginine 22.2 Valine* 20 Methionine* 16.4 Isoleucine*18.3 Tryptophan* 3.1 Leucine* 23 Phenylalanine* 39 Lysine* 13 Total 431*Essential amino acids 226

HYTb is typically produced by the centrifugation of the fermentationproduct formed by the biodegradation product. As the biodegradationprocess proceeds, nutrients for the microorganisms used for thebiodegradation process, e.g. HQE, are depleted and the pH drops due tothe acid produced during the fermentation. This causes themicroorganisms in the fermentation product to die or become dormant.Depending on the g force and time of the centrifugation of thefermentation product, such microorganisms can be found in HYTb.Accordingly, HYTb can include any one or more of the above identifiedcomponents, e.g. chitosan and glucosamine, in combination with all orpart of the microbial component of the fermentation process that ispresent when it is stopped. Alternatively, the centrifugation mayproceed to a point where substantially all of the microbial component isdepleted from HYTb. In such cases the microbial component can becentrifuged into the HYTc fraction. Alternatively, HYTc can be separatedfrom HYTb by low g centrifugation. The HYTb can then be centrifuged toform a pellet of microorganisms and a microorganism free-HYTb aqueoussolution.

As used herein, the term “HYTc” refers to the solid fraction obtainedfrom the biodegradation process. The primary component of HYTc ischitin. It typically has an average molecular weight of about 2300daltons and constitutes about 64 wt % of the composition. About 6% ofHYTc contains minerals including calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, ironand manganese, about 24 wt % protein and 6% water. It has a specificgravity of about 272 Kg/m³. The chitin in HYTc typically hasmicroorganisms from the fermentation product associated with it.Chitinolytic microorganisms have a propensity to associate with solidchitin. This is based on the affinity of chitinolytic microorganisms forthe chitin substrate. Accordingly, HYTc can also contain chitinolyticmicroorganisms unless steps are taken to remove them. In the case ofHQE, such chitinolytic microorganisms include one or more of thechitinase and/or exochitinase producing microorganisms discussed herein.Such microorganism organisms include but are not limited to Bacillussubtilis (SILoSil® BS) Bacillus thuringiensis strains HD-1 and HD-73(SILoSil®BT), and Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL). The chitinolyticmicroorganisms can be removed from the solid chitin by sterilization,pasteurization or washing the chitin with anti-microbial compounds sucgas soaps or chlorine. HYTc may also contain additional microorganismspresent at the end of the biodegradation process because of the presenceof residual fermentation product or the centrifugation of HYTb.

HQE Consortium

The following are the microorganisms in HQE which are believed to beinvolved in the biodegradation process and their known properties. Insome cases the strain is identified as “Bioderpac, 2008”. Where thespecies is not known, the species and strain are identified as“Bioderpac, 2008”

HQE was deposited with the ATCC on Apr. 27, 2010 and given PatentDeposit Designation PTA-10861.

Bacillus subtilis ((SILoSil® BS) is a Gram positive bacterium which ismesophilic and grows at an optimum temperature between 25 and 35° C. Itis aerobic and can grow in anaerobic conditions and utilizes a widevariety of carbon sources. It contains two nitrate reductases, one ofwhich is utilized for nitrogen assimilation. It is capable of secretingamylase, proteases, pullulanases, chitinases, xilanases and lipases.

Bacillus thuringiensis (Strains HD-1 and HD-73 (SILoSil® BT)) are GramPositive anaerobic facultative bacteria, in the form of a peritrichousflagella. Strains HD-1 and HD-73 synthetizes crystals with diversegeometric forms of proteic and insecticide activity during the sporeperiod. Strains HD-1 and HD-73 secret exochitanases when in a chitincontaining medium and can be utilized for the degradation of thecrustacean residues during the production of chitooligosaccharides.

Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008) is an aerobic facultative bacterium,gram positive, and spore forming. It is mesophilic and grows at anoptimum temperature between 20 and 40° C. It produces the antibioticszwittermicin A and kanosamin.

Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008) is a Gram-positive, motile,spore forming and facultative anaerobic bacterium. It producesbacitracin, alpha amylases, lactamases, proteases and alkalinephosphatases. This is a non-pathogen microorganism that is associatedwith plants or plant materials.

Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac, 2008) is a Gram-positive aerobicbacterium. It is considered a saprophyte. It produces glucosedehydrogenase, penicillin amydase, beta-amidase and neutral proteases.

Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) is a member of one of theeight species of lactic acid bacteria. It is Gram positive,non-sporulating and produces lactic acid during fermentation thatutilizes lactose as a principal source of carbon to produce energy. Itgrows with or without the presence of oxygen in an acidic medium (pH4-5). It produces the bactereocins named lactacin B, organic acids,diacetyls and hydrogen peroxide.

Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008) is a mesophilic, facultativeanaerobic which is Gram positive and non-spore forming. It has theability to adapt to cold temperatures. The optimum pH for its growth is5.5. It ferments galactose, glucose, fructose, manose, manitol, andacetylglucosamine. This species can be grown over a wide range of pH andtemperature. It produces amylase enzymes. It inhibits the growth ofpathogenic bacteria such as H. pylori by reducing pH through theproduction of (1) organic acids such as acetic, proprionic or lacticacid or (2) hydrogen peroxide. This microorganism secrets bacterocines.

Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008) is a bacteria with multipleflagellum, forced aerobic and its optimal temperature for growth isbetween 25 and 35° C. It produces thermostable lipases and proteases. Itis antagonist towards a large number of soil fungus strains. It producessecondary metabolites such as antibiotics, iron chelates, and cyanides.It produces endochitanase and cellulase in mediums with differentglucose concentrations.

Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL) is a saprophyte fungus. It exhibitsantibiotic action and biological competition and for this reason hasbiological control properties. It produces enzymes that degrade cellwalls or a combination of such activities. It produces glucanases,chitinases, lipases, and extracellular proteases when it interacts withsome pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium.

Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008) is a nitrogen fixating bacteria.It synthesizes a hydrogenase system that participates in the recyclingof hydrogen to avoid its loss during nitrogen fixation.

Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008) is an aerobic bacterium. Itproduces nitrogenases and is capable of nitrogen fixation.

Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008) is a Gram positive bacteria,anaerobic obligated. It produces ferroxine (an electron transportingprotein) that acts as a direct electron donor in the reduction ofproteic iron.

Proteus vulgaris (Bioderpac, 2008) Is a gram positive bacteria,anaerobic, facultative that grows at temperatures close to 23° C. Itproteolytically degrades proteins to free amino acids by the enzymes itproduces.

Streptomyces sp. (Bioderpac, 2008) is a Gram-positive soil bacterium. Itproduces multiple enzymes that metabolize diverse nutrients. It cansurvive significant changes in temperature, humidity and nutrientsources. The extracellular enzymes produced by these bacteria utilizechitin and chitosan as substrates at a pH of 4.5 to 6.5 and at 60° C.These are conditions generated at the beginning and at the end stages oflactic fermentation in the biodegradation process.

Nitrobacter sp. (Bioderpac, 2008) is Gram negative bacteria, aerobic,which converts nitrites into nitrates. It grows at a pH between 6 and 9and at temperatures between 10 to 34° C. The bacteria degrade organicpolymers such as chitin into compounds that are utilized by otherorganisms, such as Pseudomonas fluorescens ( ) and Rhizobium japonicum(Bioderpac2008).

Micrococcus sp. (Bioderpac, 2008) is a spheric Gram positive bacterium.This microorganism in association with Streptomyces sp ( ) is capable ofdegrading colloidal chitin derivatives.

Groups and Enzymatic Activity of Microorganisms in HQE

The biodegradation of the components of marine animals or by-productsrequires hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases, lipases, and chitinases.The disclosed microbial compositions contain one or more of suchenzymes.

The primary group of microorganisms in HQE are Lactobacillus acidophilus(Biodepac 2008), Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Pseudomonasfluorescens (Biodepac 2008), Bacillus licheniformis (Biodepac 2008) andTrichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL). These microorganisms are capable ofbiodegrading arthropod or arthropod by-products. One or more of themembers of this primary group also have a synergistic action whencombined with other microorganisms from HQE.

The first group of microorganisms includes microorganisms which causethe reduction of pH and which stabilize fermentation due to theproduction of organic acids and hydrogen peroxide. This group includesLactobacillus acidophilus (Biodepac 2008) and Lactobacillus casei(Biodepac 2008). Their activity is important at the start offermentation and during the final stages of fermentation to produce theoptimum pH for the hydrolytic enzymes. Their activity also creates aculture environment which prevents the growth of unwanted microorganismsand favors the demineralization of the chitin residues. Lactobacillusacidophilus (Biodepac 2008) is a member of the primary group.

The second group of microorganisms includes microorganisms which produceextracellular enzymes. This second group includes Bacillus subtilis(SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus (Biodepac 2008), Trichoderma harzianum(Biodepac 2008), Rhizobium japonicum (Biodepac 2008) and Azotobactervinelandii (Biodepac 2008). The chitin chains in arthropod or arthropodby-products are associated with protein molecules. The separation ofsuch polymers requires the hydrolytic action obtained from thechitinolytic and proteolytic enzymes produced by these microorganisms.Both types of enzymes break the chains on the internal portion of thepolymer to produce oligomers of diverse sizes. The action from theseenzymes occurs in a successive manner within the intermediate and finalphases of the fermentation process when the appropriate pH conditionsare achieved. The microorganisms on this group and the environmentalconditions they produce facilitate the liberation of pigments and thelipid fraction adhered to these residues. Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil®BS) and Trichoderma harzianum (Biodepac 2008) are members of the primarygroup.

The third group of microorganisms includes the microorganisms Bacilluslicheniformis (Biodepac 2008), Pseudomonas flourescens (Biodepac 2008),Sptreptomyces, (Biodepac 2008) and Clostridium (Biodepac 2008). Thesemicroorganisms hydrolyze oligomers (chito-oligosaccharides and peptides)to produce chitobioses, glucosamine, and free amino acids. Bacilluslicheniformis (Biodepac 2008) and Pseudomonas flourescens (Biodepac2008) are members of the primary group.

In preferred embodiments, one or two of the first, second and thirdgroups of microorganisms can be combined. Alternatively, all of thefirst, second and third groups can be combined.

A fourth group of microorganisms includes Bacillus thuringiensis(strains HD-1 and/or HD-73), Streptomyces (Bioderpac, 2008), Micrococcus(Bioderpac, 2008), Nitrobacter (Bioderpac, 2008) and Proteus vulgaris(Bioderpac, 2008). The fourth group of microorganisms can be combinedwith (1) the primary group of microorganisms (2) any of the first,second and third groups of microorganisms (3) the combination of one ortwo of the first, second and third groups of microorganisms or (4) thecombination of all of the first second and third groups. The addition ofthis fourth group results in a synergistic effect which enhances thebiodegradation process.

Each of these groups, including the primary group, are separately usefuland can be combined with prior art microbial compositions to enhancetheir performance. In this regard, the fourth group is particularlypreferred.

Table 2 sets forth some of the aforementioned combinations. Column 1 isa list of the known microorganisms in HQE that are believed to be activein the biodegradation process. Column 2 lists the microorganisms fromcolumn 1 without the microorganisms in the fourth group ofmicroorganisms. Column 3 shows the combination of the primarymicroorganisms while columns 4, 5 and 6 identify the combination ofmicroorganisms from the first, second and third groups. Column 4 is thecombination of groups 1 and 2; column 5 of groups 1 and 3 and column 6groups 2 and 3. Other useful combinations are set forth in columns 7-10.

TABLE 2 Culture Composition Microorganism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Bacillussubtilis X X X X X X X X Bacillus cereus X X X X X X Bacillus X Xmegaterium Azotobacter X X X X X X vinelandii Lactobacillus X X X X X XX X acidophilus Lactobacillus X X X X X X casei Trichoderma X X X X X XX X harzianum Rhizobium X X X X X X japonicum Clostridium X X X X X Xpasteurianum Bacillus X X X X X X X X licheniformis Pseudomonas X X X XX fluorescens Bacillus X X X X X X thuringiensis Streptomyces X X X X XX X Nitrobacter X X X X X Micrococcus X X X X X Proteus vulgaris X X X XX

The activity of the enzymatic extracts produced by the microorganismswithin HQE is complex, but has permitted the degradation of thechitinous residues of arthropods such as crustaceans. The microorganismsin HQE are activated in a successive manner according to the environmentgenerated by the organisms used.

Methods for Identification and Isolation of Microbes in HQE

It is important to obtain pure isolates before attempting tocharacterize or identify a species. A few bacteria are morphologicallyunique and can be identified without isolation, but nearly all requireisolation. The following describes the isolation of pure cultures from amixture of species contained within HQE for Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil®BS), Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus licheniformis(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillusacidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008),Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum(strains HD-1 and HD-73), Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008),Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum(Bioderpac, 2008), Proteus vulgaris (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillusthuringiensis (SILoSil® BT), Streptomyces sp. (Bioderpac, 2008),Nitrobacter sp. (Bioderpac, 2008) and Micrococcus sp. (Bioderpac, 2008).

The first steps include:

-   -   (1) Dilution streaking and differential Incubations    -   (2) Identification and separation of colony types    -   (3) Narrowing down the collection, and    -   (4) Determining the initial characteristics of specific colonies        and the preservation of Isolates.

Dilution Streaking and Differential Incubations

Once a specimen is removed from the HQE sample it should be culturedimmediately. Any liquid sample must be thoroughly vortexed prior topreparation of the plates because non-motile bacteria may settle to thebottom of a sample if they are associated with particulate matter.Unfortunately, bacteria do not segregate homogeneously and replicatesamples from the same mixture may contain different quantities ofbacteria. The object of thorough vortexing and subsequent dilutionstreaking is to spread out individual CFUs (Colony Forming Units) so asto obtain discrete colonies that may be sub-cultured.

All of the mentioned microorganism can be separately subjected to thefollowing procedures for identification and isolation with the exceptionof Nitrobacter sp. which will be explained separately.

A loop full of thoroughly vortexed sample from HQE is obtainedaseptically and applied to one edge of the agar surface. With back andforth movements about one-fourth of the surface should be streaked whiledrawing the loop toward the middle of the plate. Streaking should notbreak the surface of the agar, and there should be (20 or more) streaklines produced. To dilute or spread out the sample the loop must beflamed to destroy all viable material, touched to a clean part of theagar to cool it, then streaks made perpendicular to the originalinoculum, overlapping that part of the plate once or twice. The secondsection should cover one-half of the remaining sterile surface. Thisspreads out a small part of the original inoculum possibly diluting itsufficiently to result in the appearance of individual colonies afterincubation. A third section is then streaked perpendicular to the secondsection, flaming and cooling the loop and overlapping the previoussection as before, to further dilute the inoculum.

In the preparation of isolates from each batch of product, the nextphase is to prepare replicate streak plates and incubate them underdifferent conditions in an inverted position, to maximize opportunitiesto differentiate colony types for Bacillus subtilis (SILoSiI® BS),Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac,2008), Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus acidophilus(Bioderpac, 2008), Lactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008), Pseudomonasfluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008), Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL),Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008), Azotobacter vinelandii(Bioderpac, 2008), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008), Proteusvulgaris (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus thuringiensis (strains HD-1 andHD-73, SILoSil®BT), Streptomyces sp. (Bioderpac, 2008), and Micrococcussp. (Bioderpac, 2008). The temperature of incubation is varied(typically 25, 30, and 37° C.) and incubated under both aerobic andanaerobic conditions. This approach increases the chances of separatingindividual species, since different species/bacterium have differentoptimum temperature ranges for growth and different requirements foroxygen. The aerobic organisms should be checked after one day ofincubation, since some of our featured bacteria being tested grow veryfast and crowd out the others.

Approaches to Identifying and Separating Colony Types

A dissecting microscope with a trans-illuminator can be used todistinguish individual colonies. Plates should remain inverted duringexamination. Colonies are distinguishable by size, shape, opacity, andtexture regarding afore the mentioned microorganisms. Upon examination,it is best to indicate the colonies to be sampled by putting a smallmark next to them on the bottom of the plate. It will be necessary toturn over the plate lid to collect colony material. Caution should betaken to carefully insert the sterile loop only for the time it takes toobtain an inoculum.

For color, surface characteristics and profile (raised, flat, etc.), itis necessary to examine the colonies with incident light, through thetransparent lid. Lids should be left on otherwise the plates will becomecontaminated. Before turning the plate remove and invert the lid toremove the moisture. The old lid should be replaced with a new one forviewing.

In the event two colonies overlap and still can be distinguished, thenat least two colonies are present. Colonies usually have a fairlysimple, uniform texture. If an area resembles a mosaic, there areprobably at least two species. Each unique type of colony should besampled by taking a needle inoculum and performing a three way dilutionstreak on a fresh plate. Care should be taken to sample only the colonyof interest. Incubate each new streak plate under aerobic conditions atthe temperature which the original plate was incubated.

Species will exhibit temperature optima, indicated by faster growthand/or larger colonies at temperatures closest to ideal. Any colony thatis sampled from an anaerobically incubated plate will likely be afacultative anaerobe.

Narrow Down the Collection

Duplicates of the same species and strain are likely to be isolated fromdifferent streak plates. Many different species and different strains ofthe same species produce very similar colony types. To narrow the numberof isolates to unique species/strains, culture suspected duplicateisolates on the same plate. On two thirds of the surface conduct two“mini-dilutions” to obtain individual colonies for each culture, and onthe remaining one-third mix them. After incubation, if the two isolatesgrow on the same plate and/or mixed inoculum produce two distinguishablecolony types, two unique isolates have been identified.

Initial Characterization of Colonies and Preservation of Isolates

Most of the characteristic of the organisms under consideration shouldbe determined using incident, not transmitted, light.

Once an isolate is obtained and purity established by both colonyexamination and microscopic examination, an agar slant tube should beinoculated and incubated at an appropriate temperature with the caploose to allow gas exchange. After growth appears, the culture should bedescribed, the cap tightened, and the tube kept at room temperature as asource of pure culture for assays.

In addition to gross descriptive characterization, a young (<18 h)culture should be gram stained and the results recorded including cellshape and size, sheaths or capsules if evident, and any evidence ofspores or similar structures. Relationship to oxygen is the next stepwith which to narrow possible categories. After that, it is thisparticular combination of Gram stain results, cell type, andrelationship to oxygen that determines the next series of steps towardcharacterizing the isolate.

The Deletion and Counting of Nitrobacter sp. Population in the Product

There have been several studies on the metabolism, survival, and growthof nitrite oxidizers in pure cultures and on their nitrifying activityin various environments, but fewer studies have dealt with naturalNitrobacter population. Although the biological conversion of nitrite tonitrate is a well known process, studies and procedures of theNitrobacter population are currently hampered by inadequate methods ofdetection and counting.

This failure is due in part to the unfavorable physiologicalcharacteristics of these bacteria, namely slow growth, small biomass,and susceptibility of cultures to contamination. There is a way to countNitrobacter population in the soil but it is time consuming andselective.

Detailed Description of the Growth Process

Bacillus cereus (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac,2008),

Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS) and Bacillus licheniformis (Bioderpac,2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agar.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis nutrient agar, (4) incubate plates at 37° C. for 24-48 hours, (5)colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Pseudomonas fluorescens and Proteus vulgaris

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agar.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis nutrient agar, (4) incubate plates at 37° C. for 24-48 hours, (5)colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei

The Agar M.R.S. was developed by Man, Rogosa and Sharpe to provide meansthat could demonstrate a good growth of lactobacillus and other lacticacid bacteria. The culture medium allows an abundant development of allthe species of lactobacillus. Peptona and glucose constitute thenitrogen source, carbon and of other necessary elements for thebacterial growth. The sorbitan monoleate, magnesium, manganese andacetate, contribute cofactors and can inhibit the development of somemicroorganisms. The ammonium citrate acts like an inhibiting agent ofthe growth of negative Gram bacteria. See Table 3.

TABLE 3 Formula (in grams per liter) Instructions Proteose peptone N^(o)3 10.0 Suspend 64 g of the medium in a liter Meat extract 8.0 ofdistilled water. Let it rest 5 minutes Yeast extract 4.0 and mix warmingup to boiling point Glucose 20.0 during 1 or 2 minutes. Sterilize inSorbitan Monoleate 1 ml sterilizer during 15 minutes to 121° C.Dipotassium Phosphate 2.0 Sodium Acetate 5.0 Ammonium Citrate 2.0Magnessium Sulfate 0.2 Manganese Sulfate 0.05 Agar 13.0 Final pH: 6.4 ±0.2

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agar M.R.Ssubstrate.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubateinto aerobic chamber with 5-10% CO₂ a replicate plate series with 1 mlof the dilution range, the plate medium is agar M.R.S., (4) incubateplates at 33-37° C. for 72 hours or 30° C. for 5 days, (5) colonyforming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Results. Colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Characteristics of the colonies: generally small, white-grayish, smoothor rough.

Characteristics of the medium: Prepared medium is yellow.

Lactobacillus Identification:

TABLE 4 Growth at Acid NH₃ Growth in 4% 15° C. 45° C. la su sal mn so xiArginine NaCl broth L. acidophilus − + + + + − − − − − L. casei + V +/−+/− + + + − − +

Azotobacter vinelandii (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agarsubstrate (Burk's, Asbhy, Jensen's).

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) incubate this solution at 25° C. for 48 hours, (3) commence aserial dilution range up to 1-10, (4) incubate a replicate plate, withnutrient agar substrate, series with 1 ml of the dilution range, theplate medium is nutrient agar (5) incubate plates at 25° C. for 48-72hours, (6) colony forming units should be 1,0000,000 per 1 ml ofproduct.

Clostridium pasteurianum (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: phosphate buffered water and plate medium standardmethods agar substrate (TYG).

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of phosphatebuffered water, (2) make appropriate serial dilutions (3) plateappropriate aliquot for desired dilution into Petri dishes, (4) addtempered standard methods agar and mix of dish, (5) place inverted driedplates into anaerobic chamber, (6) incubate plates at 35-37° C. for48-72 hours, (7) after incubation period, removed plates from anaerobicchamber and count plates, record dilutions used and the total number ofcolonies counted for each dilution, (8) colony forming units should be1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

The identification of this species of Clostridium uses a typicalmicroscopic morphology of a colony which allows a fast and presumptiveidentification of some species of Clostridium frequently isolated. Inaddition, along with the use of simple biochemical tests such as thestudy of the production of lecitinase and lipase in agar egg yolk, thehydrolysis of the gelatin and urea and the production of indol throughthe fast method (p-dimetil-amino-cinnamaldehide), constitute an easy andinexpensive method for the identification, even definitive, for some ofthem.

Micrococcus sp. (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agar.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis nutrient agar, (4) incubate plates at 37° C. for 24 hours, (5) colonyforming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

If positive Gram coccos are found, perform antibiotic sensitivity tests.Micrococcus is sensitive to Bacitracin and resistant to furazolidone.

Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium ALM (agar yeastextract mannitol).

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis ALM (agar yeast extract mannitol), (4) incubate plates at 28° C. for96 hours, (5) colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml ofproduct.

To confirm Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008), the isolated colony isused to infect a leguminosae aseptically to cause the formation ofnodules.

Trichoderma harzianum (TRICHOSIL)

Media ingredient: purified water and malt extract agar medium (2%wt/vol) substrate supplemented with chloramphenicol, streptomycinsulfate, and nystatin.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis malt extract agar (4) incubate plates at 25° C. for 4 days, (5)colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Bacillus thuringiensis (Strains HD-1 and HD-73 (SILoSil® BT))

Media ingredient: purified water and plate Superbroth medium agarsubstrate supplemented with 2 g/litro de D-glucosa and 50 μg/mlerythromycin.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis Superbroth agar (4) incubate plates at 28° C. for 10-14 days, (5)colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Streptomyces sp. (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate actinomycete isolation agarmedium.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis actinomycete isolation agar (4) incubate plates at 28° C. for 2-3days, (5) colony forming units should be 1,000,000 per 1 ml of product.

Nitrobacter sp. (Bioderpac, 2008)

Media ingredient: purified water and plate medium nutrient agarsubstrate.

Procedure: (1) place 0.1 ml liquid sample of HQE in 9.9 ml of purifiedwater, (2) commence a serial dilution range up to 1-10, (3) incubate areplicate plate series with 1 ml of the dilution range, the plate mediumis plate nutrient agar substrate, (4) incubate plates at 30° C. for10-14 days.

Biodegradation Process

In a preferred embodiment, the marine arthropod is a crustacean and thepreferred crustacean is shrimp. Shrimp by-product comprises shrimpcephalothorax and/or exoskeleton.

In the biodegradation process, it is preferred that the fermentation befacultative aerobic fermentation. It is also preferred that thefermentation is carried out at a temperature of about 30° C. to 40° C.The pH is preferably less than about 6, more preferably less than about5.5. However, the pH should be maintained above about 4.3. Thefermentation is carried out for about 24-96 hours. In some embodiments,the fermentation is carried out for about 24-48 hours and morepreferably 24-36 hours. These fermentation times are far shorter thanthe typical prior art fermentation times of 10 to 15 days to achievesubstantially the same amount of digestion, albeit without detectableformation of chitosan and glucosamine.

The separation of the mixture is preferably by centrifugation. (e.g.about 920 g). Gravity separation can also be used but is not preferredbecause of the time required to achieve separation.

The mixture separates in to three fractions: solid, aqueous and lipid.The solid fraction comprises chitin and is designated HYTc. The aqueousfraction comprises protein hydroysate, amino acids, chitosan andglucosamine and is designated HYTb. The lipid fraction comprisessterols, vitamin A and E and carotenoid pigments such as astaxanthine.

Any of the microbial compositions identified herein can be used in thebiodegradation process, In some embodiments it is preferred that HQE beused in the biodegradation process. In other embodiments, it ispreferred that HYTb be added to HQE or the fermentation broth. Asdescribed above, HYTb contains amino acids, chitosan, glucosamine andtrace elements including calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, iron andmanganese. HYTb also contains enzymes such as lactic enzymes, proteases,lipases, chitinases, lactic acid, polypeptides and other carbohydrates.HYTb can also contain dormant microorganisms from a prior biodegradationprocess. Such microorganisms can become reactivated and, in combinationwith HQE, contribute to a more robust biodegradation process as comparedto when HQE is used by itself as otherwise described herein

More particularly, the process includes the following steps:

-   -   a. Activation of the microbial cells in a sugar base solution to        enhance its growth and the biomass formation.    -   b. Milling of the shrimp by-products (cephalthorax and        exosqueleton) to make a homogeneous paste.    -   c. Homogeneous mixing of the shrimp by-product paste with at        least 10% of the activated inoculum.    -   d. Adjustment of the pH values to less than 6.0 in the mixture        using a citric acid solution to inhibit the growth of micro        organisms and to promote the development of microbial cells that        constitute the inoculum.    -   e. Fermentation of the mixture in a non continuous agitated        system at temperatures within a range of 30 to 40° C. at least        for at least 96 hours maintaining pH at less than 5.0. The pH is        monitored periodically. If the pH rises above 5.0, a citric acid        buffer is added in an amount to maintain the pH below 5.0.    -   f. Centrifugation of the ferment to separate the three principal        fractions: chitin, liquid hydrolysate and pigmented paste.    -   g. Rinsing of the crude chitin and recollection of the rinse        water to recuperate fine solids or minerals.    -   h. Drying of the chitin and storage.    -   i. Drying and storage of the liquid hydrolysate.    -   j. The pigmented paste (lipid fraction) is stored in closed        recipients for conservation.

The process and operational fundamentals are better understood withreference to FIG. 1 and the following detailed description.

Activation of Microbial Cells

A microbial composition as disclosed herein is used as inoculum. Theinoculum of HQE has a concentration of microbes of about 2.5 to 3.0%(w/v). HQE is activated by dilution to 5% in sugar cane solution (3.75%final concentration of sugar cane), and incubated at 37° C. for 5 days.HYTb (10 ml per liter of culture) is preferably added to provide asource of minerals and naturally derived amino acids. The cellulargrowth of the microorganisms was estimated by optical density measuredat 540 nm. The activation is complete at an optical density of about1.7. The concentration of microbes after activation is about 1.9 to 3.0%(w/v).

Preparation of Samples

The shrimp by-products samples are obtained from shrimp processingplants. Slightly thawed and minced residue (1500 g by batch) is mixedwith 99 grams of sugar cane (final concentration 6.6% wt %) and 85.5 mlof activated HQE 5% (v/w) (optical density of cell=1.7). Then the pH isadjusted to 5.5 using 2 M citric acid.

Fermentation Control

The mixture is incubated at 36° C. with a non continuous agitation for96 h. During the fermentation process, the pH is monitored by using apotentiometer, and the total titratable acidity (TTA, %) was determinedby titration with 0.1 N NaOH until a pH of 8.5 is obtained. The TTA isexpressed as a percentage of lactic acid.

Conditions of Separation

The fermentation product is a viscous silage which has an intense orangecolor, due to the astaxanthine presence. The ensilage is centrifuged (5°C.) at 1250 rpm (930 g) for 15 min to obtain the chitin, the liquidhydrolysates, and the pigment paste. The upper phase (pigment paste) isseparated manually. The liquid hydrolysates are separated bydecantation, and the sediment that constitutes the raw chitin is washedwith distilled water to separate fine solids. The resulting liquid iscollected and dried. The raw chitin, liquid hydrolysates and fine solidsare dried at 60° C. All the fractions are stored to protect them fromlight.

The above protocol was carried out using HQE in three fermentationbatches in duplicate as set forth in the following examples.

Example 1 Fermentation Control by Measurement of pH and Total TitratableAcidity (TTA, %)

The average initial values of pH and TTA were 7.31±0.10 and 0.53±0.09,respectively. As shown in FIG. 2, the pH was initially reduced to 6.5 bythe addition of 2 M citric acid. Then, due to proteolysis and therelease of ammonium, the pH increased again to 7.11±0.08 during thefirst 2 h, and later, the pH diminished by 28% (up to 5.28±0.01) duringthe 12 hours of fermentation. At approximately 24 hours of fermentation,the final pH was 4.57±0.15. In parallel to the decrease in pH a similarbehavior was observed in the mean values of the TTA. During the first 2hours of the average values of TTA were 1%, and then these valuesincreased gradually to an average value of 3.33±0.23 at 24 hours, asshown in FIG. 2.

Example 2 Products of the Fermentation and Chemical Composition

After the fermentation process, the silage was centrifuged to separatethe three principal products (chitin, liquid hydrolysate, and pigmentpaste). The other product, the fine solids were retained with the rawchitin wash. Table 5 shows the proportion recovered in each fraction. Indry weight, the bigger fraction corresponded to the liquid hydrolysate(55%), then the fine solids (29%), raw chitin (10%) and pigment paste(5%). In the fermented batch, the average value of dry weight was 32%(481.1±5.6 g).

Table 6 shows the chemical characterization of each of the four mainproducts that were obtained through fermentation. The chitinous product(chitin) shows a partial demineralization reflected as ash. It alsoreveals high protein content (42.34%) quantified in the liquidhydrolysates. This facilitated the recovery of a pigment paste,consisting mainly of total lipids (42.67%), and produced a fractionabundant in ash (16.72%) in the fine solids.

TABLE 5 Products separated from fermentation Lipidic Dry matter Rawchitin Liquid hydrolysate paste Fine solids (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) 480.048.0 264.4 22.9 141.2 487.5 50.2 268.8 24.0 140.8 475.7 51.0 265.7 23.7131.7 481.1 ± 5.6 49.5 ± 2.4 266.3 ± 4.6 23.3 ± 0.5 141.9 ± 5.5

TABLE 6 Chemical composition (dry weight) of the fermentation productsProducts % Protein % Ash % Total lipid Raw chitin 18.12 ± 0.15 4.36 ±0.26 2.02 ± 0.46 Liquid hydrolysate 42.34 ± 0.03 7.96 ± 0.16 4.28 ± 0.28Lipidic paste 30.80 ± 0.25 5.11 ± 0.16 42.67 ± 0.63  Fine solids 31.62 ±0.10 16.72 ± 0.37  Nd

Example 3 Amino Acid Profile in the Dry Powder Hydrolysates

The amino acid content of dried hydrolysate was determined as describedby Lopez-Cervantes et al., “Analysis of free amino acids in fermentedshrimp waste by high-performance liquid chromatography”, Journal ofChromatography A, volume 1105, 1 (2006). Table 6 shows the total aminoacid profile of the dry powder hydrolysates. The proportion of essentialamino acids was of 52.5% to dry powder hydrolysates.

TABLE 7 Amino acid profile dry powder hydrolysates (mg per g dry weight)Amino acid Dry powder hydrolysates Aspartic acid 38 Glutamic acid 39Serine 16 Histidina* 9 Glycine 28 Threonine* 14 Alanine 30 Proline 8Tyrosine* 70 Arginine 18 Valine* 20 Methionine* 4 Isoleucine* 15Leucine* 23 Phenylalanine* 39 Lysine* 13 Total 394 * Essential amino 207acids

Example 4 Quantification of Glucosamine in Raw Chitin

In the chitin, the content of glucosamine was quantified as an index ofpurity. The contents of glucosamine in chitin were 516, 619 and 640 mgper g (dry weight), these values correspond to the results of threefermentation batches carried out in duplicate. Therefore, the averageamount of glucosamine in this study was 591 mg per g dry weight ofchitin. The method for quantification of glucosamine was reported byLopez-Cervantes et al., “Quantitation of glucosamine from shrimp wasteusing HPLC” Journal of Chromatographic Science, volume 45, 1 (2007).

Example 5 Contents of Astaxanthin and Profile of Fatty Acids in PigmentPaste

Astaxanthin is the main pigment in the lipidic paste obtained fromfermented shrimp waste. The content of astaxanthin ranged from 1.98 to2.25 mg g⁻¹ of dry lipidic paste, and the average is 2.11 mg g⁻¹ of drylipidic paste. Astaxanthin was determined by a version of the method ofLopez-Cervantes et al., “Quantification of astaxanthin in shrimp wastehydrolysate by HPLC” Biomedical Chromatography, volume 20, 981 (2006).

In the pigment paste, fourteen fatty acids were identified. The palmiticacid (C16:0), and the oleic acid (C18:1n9) were found in higherquantity.

1. A microbial composition comprising ATCC Patent Deposit DesignationPTA-10861
 2. A microbial composition comprising (a) one or more lacticacid bacteria (LAB) and (b) one or more microorganisms selected from thegroup of genera consisting of Bacillus, Azotobacter, Trichoderma,Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces., Micrococcus,Nitrobacter and Proteus.
 3. The microbial composition of claim 2 whereinsaid LAB is selected from the genera consisting of Lactobacillus,Pediococcus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus.
 4. The microbialcomposition of claim 2 wherein said LAB is selected from the groupconsisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei.
 5. Themicrobial composition of claim 2 wherein said LAB is selected from thegroup consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus (Bioderpac, 2008) andLactobacillus casei (Bioderpac, 2008).
 6. The microbial composition ofclaim 2 wherein said Bacillus is selected from the group consisting ofBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megateriu, Bacilluslicheniformis and Bacillus thuringiensis, said Azotobacter isAzotobacter vinelandii, said Trichoderma is Trichoderma harzianum, saidRhizobium is Rhizobium japonicum, said Clostridium is Clostridiumpasteurianu and said Pseudomonas is Pseudomonas fluorescens.
 7. Themicrobial composition of claim 2 wherein said Bacillus is selected fromthe group consisting of Bacillus subtilis (SILoSil® BS), Bacillus cereus(Bioderpac, 2008), Bacillus megaterium (Bioderpac, 2008), Bacilluslicheniformis (Bioderpac, 2008) and Bacillus thuringiensis (strains HD-1and HD-73 (SILoSil° BT)), said Azotobacter is Azotobacter vinelandii(Bioderpac, 2008), said Trichoderma is Trichoderma harzianum(TRICHOSIL), said Rhizobium is Rhizobium japonicum (Bioderpac, 2008),said Clostridium is Clostridium pasteurianu (Bioderpac, 2008) and saidPseudomonas is Pseudomonas fluorescens (Bioderpac, 2008).
 8. Themicrobial composition of claim 2 wherein at least one of said Bacillus,Azotobacter, Trichoderma, Rhizobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas,Streptomyces., Micrococcus, Nitrobacter and Proteus is a chitinolyticstrain.
 9. A biodegradation process comprising: mixing a marine animalor marine animal by-product with the microbial composition of any ofclaims 1 through 11 to form a mixture; fermenting said mixture; andseparating said mixture into solid, aqueous and lipid fractions.
 10. Theprocess of claim 9 wherein said marine animal is a marine arthropod. 11.The process of claim 10 wherein said marine arthropod is selected fromthe group consisting of shrimp, crab and krill.
 12. The process of claim9 wherein said marine animal is fish.
 13. The process of claim 9 whereinsaid microbial composition comprises ATCC Patent Deposit DesignationPTA-10861.
 14. The process of claim 9 wherein said fermenting is byfacultative aerobic fermentation.
 15. The process of claim 9 whereinsaid separating is by centrifugation.
 16. The process of claim 9 whereinsaid fermenting is at a temperature of about 30° C. to 40° C.
 17. Theprocess of claim 16 wherein said fermenting is carried out at a pHbetween about 4.3 and 5.0
 18. The process of claim 16 wherein saidfermentation is carried out for about 24-96 hours.
 19. The process ofclaim 14 wherein said aqueous fraction comprises amino acids, chitosanand glucosamine
 20. The process of claim 19 wherein said aqueousfraction further comprises trace elements.
 21. The aqueous fraction madeaccording to claim 19 or
 20. 22. The process of claim 12 wherein saidsolid fraction comprises chitin.
 23. The solid fraction made accordingto claim
 22. 24. A composition comprising HYTb.
 25. A compositioncomprising HYTc.